Search for: "English v. Taylor"
Results 141 - 160
of 210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am
Supreme Court decision Taylor v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) Mark Lewis Law v Taylor Hampton, heard 25-27 and 30-31 October 2017 (Moulder J). [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Selim v NYC Transit Authority, 220 AD2d 515]Terminating an employee for failing to turn in his keys when ordered. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics
1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor
Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment
1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William
On Conveyancers' Evidence
1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas
On the Admissibility of… [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 6:36 am
In Mahmoud v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Other cases included: Mr Peter Light v Hounslow Chronicle, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; RMT Union v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; A man v The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 3, 15/06/2012; A man v Irish News, Clause 3, 15/06/2012; Mr Martin Robbins v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mr Colin Cortbus v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 4, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v Daily… [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
” Much later in Taylor v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm
’ India A comment piece in the Hoot has questioned what recourses ordinary people have when they are libelled by some of the country’s biggest newspapers, after a story published in a number of national English language newspapers. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:32 pm
” A year ago, EFF’s Executive Director, Cindy Cohn, shared these words in EFF's statement about the police killings of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
X v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
In the case of Pedro Alfaro v Taylor [2018] NSWDC 134 Gibson DCJ dismissed a libel action against the Guardian where the plaintiff refused to attend court and made a number of abusive communications to the Court. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
Canadian case: Cinar Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
IPSO has sided with the Yorkshire Post after a complaint against the paper by Robin Tilbrook, chairman of the English Democrats, who alleged that a story about last year’s Batley and Spen by-election was inaccurate. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:43 am
Much of that stems from the Supreme Court’s 1969 decision in Boykin v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
Araba Taylor: “The Case of the Rustat Memorial – Does Duffield Pose all the Right Questions? [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 5:50 am
Instead, Taylor supplies a “Cf. [read post]
