Search for: "Evans v. Marks" Results 141 - 160 of 564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
  Still, the two constructs were the tools they had to get themselves there, and they had to be used in certain ways or else appear to pass–in Mark’s words–”from lawyerly deliberation to sheer willfulness” (to quote Mark’s rendering of Harlan Fiske Stone’s verdict on Colgate v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 2:30 am by Philip Cable
   Other rounds included numbers (v tricky!) [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:22 am by Mark Brennan and Arpan Sura
In doing so, plaintiffs relied on the approach taken by the Ninth Circuit in Marks v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:02 am by Venkat
Sony Network EntertainmentSecond Life Forum Selection Clause Upheld--Evans v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Might work better if claims were confined to copyright v. patent w/r/t software? [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: Mark Walsh has a first-hand account of yesterday’s oral arguments in PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a first-hand look at yesterday’s argument in Flowers v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 9:18 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The brief responds to the Opening Brief which my Damon Key colleagues Ken Kupchak, Mark Murakami, Matt Evans and I filed in November 2009 (available here). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:44 am by Anonymous
  In Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:10 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Evans) v Information Commissioner, heard 24-25 November 2014. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:30 am by Sophie Corke
At Pizza Limited | Rat Pack / RatPac – Not All Trade Mark Judges are Movie Producers | UK patent exams update: Major changes to invigilation arrangements for candidates taking the exams in the office | UK patent exams update: Final version of FAQs released | When free-riding someone else's brand might be a win-win situation | [Guestpost]: IP implications of 3D printing, a new studyNever Too Late 279 [Week ending August 23] No CJEU reference (yet) as… [read post]