Search for: "Evans v. Universal Property " Results 141 - 160 of 192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
Russia Speaking at the RSF and the Foreign Press Association for the launch of the 2023 World Press Freedom Index, the defence and diplomatic editor of The Independent expressed her belief that prisoner exchange is the “only route out” of jail for detained Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 13204-21 A man v Doncaster Free Press, 2 Privacy (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 13207-21 Studholme v Mail Online, 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 28 April 2022, a statement in open court was read at the High Court in the phone hacking claim brought by Dr Evan Harris, a former Hacked Off… [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The second case study deals with a very different issue, namely “the” hot intellectual-property debate of summer 2014: If a monkey takes a selfie, who owns the copyright? [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
A host of impressive signatories (including the Centre d’Etudes Internationales de la Propriété Intellectuelle (CEIPI), University of Strasbourg, CREATe at the University of Glasgow and the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition)  penned an open letter with the heading "EU Copyright Reform Proposals Unfit for the Digital Age". [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Newspaper Journalism and regulation An Ofcom investigation concluded that GB News broke broadcasting rules in an episode of Dan Wootton Tonight in which actor and founder of Reclaim Party, Laurence Fox made sexist comments about journalist, Ava Evans. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:16 am by Charon QC
He also advises clients on leasehold disputes concerning residential and commercial property. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Eugene Volokh
In 2014 and 2015, an Eleventh Circuit panel issued three decisions upholding a Florida law that made it a crime for doctors to ask patients whether they own firearms (popularly called Docs v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:00 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
  As I've already indicated, I am a senior lecturer in law at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) in Brisbane, Australia, where I teach Intellectual Property, Constitutional Law and Cyberlaw, and research within the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/yRWkxa (Henry Kelston) How to Create an eDiscovery Team – An Interview with HB Gordan from Teva Pharmaceuticals – bit.ly/xCM6yj (Amber Scorah) How to Reduce Medical Malpractice eDiscovery Issues and Costs - bit.ly/ylZmA5 (Matthew Keris) Innovation and Informed Risk-Taking are an eDiscovery Duty - bit.ly/zKtiDm (Chris Dale) Lester v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
Italy Italy’s data protection authority Garante has fined Rome’s city council and third-party property management firm Ama a combined €415,000  over privacy violations related to sensitive data breaches of individuals who have undergone abortions. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:05 am by admin
  ARTICLE V: COVENANT FOR ASSESSMENTS     …     Section 4. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Matthew Flinn
This question was addressed in Revill v Newberry [1996] QB 567. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:40 am by INFORRM
For, as Griffiths LJ said, in Lion Laboratories v Evans [1985] QB 526, it would be necessary to demonstrate that the iniquity is such as to make it vital the confidential information is published directly to the public. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(This is the classic nuisance case of Spur Industries v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]