Search for: "Ex Parte Forbes" Results 141 - 159 of 159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2010, 1:34 pm by Keith Maynard
The two adult children of billionaire developer Donald Bren, who is currently ranked #16 on the Forbes list of wealthy Americans with an estimated fortune of $12 billion, are suing their father for not being a part of their lives. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:30 am by LawDiva
She referred to her ex as “ruthless” and predicted an ugly succession battle when Mr. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 6:47 am by lawmrh
Earlier this year, Forbes ran a story on the Top Five Overpaid Jobs in America. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:56 am
An ex parte decree was passed against Eureka Forbes and, after several rounds of litigation, Eureka Forbes approached the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:00 am by John Steele
Ex-lawyer and convicted felon Bill Lerach may be teaching at UC-Irvine's law school. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
Part of the fine, $6,450, will go to the agency’s Clean Diesel School Bus Program, with the rest directed to the EPA’s risk management plan fund. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 6:14 am
According to the ruling, Caren Forbes must reconvey the mansion to her ex-husband thereby permitting his creditors to seize it. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 6:14 am by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
According to the ruling, Caren Forbes must reconvey the mansion to her ex-husband thereby permitting his creditors to seize it. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:12 am
An ex-fire official from Montauk Pleaded guilty to embezzling more than a half-million dollars. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(Financial Aspects of Intellectual Property) Climate change and Millenium Development Goals top agenda during UN Secretary General’s visit to WIPO (WIPO) Global - Trade Marks / Brands What every marketing department needs to know about trade marks (IP Spotlight) Forbes 2008 list of ‘Top-earning Dead Celebrities’ (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Trade mark protection, broadcast rights vital for sports, say stakeholders (Intellectual Property Watch) How many drafts… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Spicy IP), India: Supreme Court on exclusive marketing rights: (Spicy IP), Japan: First induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell patent at Kyoto University: (Competitive Info), Slovenia: Supplementary protection certificates in Slovenia: (The SPC Blog), United States: Biotech/pharma lobbying scoreboard – second quarter update – part II: (Patent Docs), United States: Ferring Pharmaceuticals argues to bring down direct purchaser suits: (Law 360), United States: Transferred… [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Geren, No. 06-1666 In cases concerning the availability of habeas corpus relief arising from an international coalition force's detention of American citizens who voluntarily traveled to Iraq and were alleged to have committed crimes there, the Court rules that the habeas statute extends to American citizens held overseas by American forces operating subject to an American chain of command, even when those forces are acting as part of a multinational coalition. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to… [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:54 am
The problem now is that the media just cannot get enough of the big bad China product story and Forbes Editor, Paul Maidment, does a great job explaining why this is so. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 5:34 pm
  The noteworthy part about that? [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 1:57 am
Now that they have responded to WARF's response, the patent office is expected to issue a final ruling within a few months.IPBiz notes that in ex parte re-exams, relevant to two of the re-exams here, the initially challenging party does NOT get to respond to the patentee's response to the initial Office Action. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 8:13 am
For his part, Henry Nicholas said his divorce is no cause for alarm. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 7:01 am
For the following reasons, this allegation of a cognitive defect on the part of his critics is too hasty. [read post]