Search for: "Ex Parte State Ex Rel. At"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,540
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 5:35 pm
I work part-time, because I have all kinds of ailments. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm
The cases are U.S. ex rel. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
That last case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
For almost a century after the Civil War, state-mandated segregation was in many parts of the Nation a regrettable norm. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
For almost a century after the Civil War, state-mandated segregation was in many parts of the Nation a regrettable norm. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
On June 16, the Supreme Court issued an 8-1 ruling in United States, ex rel. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:42 am
That part of the story is shocking, dismal etc (choose your descriptor). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:50 am
On June 16, the Supreme Court issued an 8-1 ruling in United States, ex rel. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
-taxpayer-controlled foreign corporation’s “accumulated post-1986 deferred foreign income” as part of the corporation’s taxable income during 2017. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 3:54 pm
On September 29, 2022, the federal district court entered an order that in relevant part dismissed without prejudice Petitioner's state-law claim and allowed only the First Amendment claim to proceed. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm
Fla.), and United States ex rel. [read post]
St. Francis Health System, Inc. pays $36.5 million to settle False Claims Act and Anti-kickback case
16 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
The lawsuit resolved by this settlement is captioned United States of America, et al., ex rel. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 11:17 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision creates a circuit split with the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Seafarers Pension Plan ex rel. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
Otto that it was not misconduct connected with the employee's work to violate a company rule forbidding all contact between current employees and ex-employees. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Many other courts have done much the same, both in state[18] and in federal courts,[19] and both before and after the Supreme Court decided Daubert, and even after Rule 702 was amended in 2000.[20] Perhaps even more disturbing is that the current edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence glibly cites to the Wells case, for the dubious proposition that “Generally, researchers are conservative when it comes to assessing causal relationships, often calling for stronger… [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:01 am
This post focuses on those rules as they apply to states before turning to the possibility of individual criminal liability. [read post]
