Search for: "F. v. F." Results 141 - 160 of 57,629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:55 am by Frank Cranmer
Cobb J explained that the Court of Appeal had set out the necessary criteria for a decision in E v Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust and F v Somerset NHS Foundation Trust [2021] EWCA Civ 1888 at [45]-[49]. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:14 am
Unione Mediterranea Di Sicurta, 364 F.3d 646, 654-55 (5th Cir. 2004) 5 Michigan Alkali Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On April 24, 2024, President Biden signed into law the 21st Century Peace through Strength Act (the Act) as part of a broader foreign aid package providing funding to Taiwan, Ukraine, and Israel. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  “[I]f you’re married and both you and your spouse are over the age of 65, there’s a 50/50 chance at least one of you will be receiving a [reduced] Social Security check until you’re 90. [read post]