Search for: "F.C.C." Results 141 - 160 of 186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2014, 12:00 am by My name
F.C.C. seeks a new path on ‘net neutrality rules, The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/20/business/fcc-to-propose-new-rules-on-open-Internet.html? [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
F.C.C. (1994), where … the court recognized that both "[c]able programmers and cable operators engage in and transmit speech" and thus "are entitled to the protection of the speech and press provisions of the First Amendment. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:37 pm by Andrew Raff
" Susan Crawford, The New York Times, An Internet for Everybody, "But the F.C.C. needn’t change either strategy. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Brandi Lupo
Baxter (2012) (exploring regulatory capture in financial regulation) “Virtuous Capture” by Matthew Wansley (argues in favor of the virtues of certain forms of regulatory capture) Testimony of Robert Hockett before the U.S .Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, Improving Financial Institution Supervision: Examining and Addressing Regulatory Capture (2012) (making recommendations based on how regulatory capture might be at work at the Fed and other agencies)… [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:10 am by Peter Breslauer
” 2015 WL 6405811, at *2 (quoting In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 2015 WL 4387780, at *5 (F.C.C. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:10 am by Peter Breslauer
” 2015 WL 6405811, at *2 (quoting In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 2015 WL 4387780, at *5 (F.C.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
F.C.C., 512 U.S. 622, 629 (1994) (explaining that a cable operator serves as a conduit for speech and is not a speaker itself). [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 2:08 am
" Justices Take Up On-Air Vulgarity Again By LINDA GREENHOUSE "The justices agreed to give the F.C.C. a chance to defend its decision to start punishing broadcasters for the isolated and fleeting on-air use of expletives. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:32 pm by Patricia Salkin
He argued that the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) rule known as PRB–1, Federal Preemption of State and Local Regulations Pertaining to Amateur Radio Facilities, 101 F.C.C.2d 952 (1985), adopted at 47 CFR § 97.15(b), (“PRB–1”) preempted the Township from restricting antenna height and the Pennsylvania state law adopting the federal standard preempted the township’s antenna height restrictions. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
Circuit Court of Appeals rejected all challenges to the FCC’s Open Internet Order. [1]The majority deemed limited its review function and opted to apply ample case precedent that defers to regulatory agencies on both procedural and substantive areas. [2] In a nutshell, the majority opted not to second guess the FCC and expressed support for the Commission’s interpretation of law and its assessment of how consumers access the Internet and what they expect from service providers. [3] This… [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Fortunately, this provision has been used quite sparingly; here’s a passage from an FCC letter based on the provision, Frank Battaglia, 7 FCC Rcd. 2345 (F.C.C.): This is in reference to the Commission inquiry into the broadcast by Station WALE(AM), Providence, Rhode Island, of a hoax broadcast that one of its on-air personalities. [read post]