Search for: "FEDERER v. DAVIS" Results 141 - 160 of 3,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
Davis v Kentucky Dept of revenue involves the right of states to provide tax exemptions only for their own bonds, discriminating against bonds issued by other states. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
The Court affirmed the United States District Court for the Northern District of California’s finding that the lawsuits against Amazon and its customers—Patreon, Vox Media, Dictionary.com, Vice Media, Oath, Inc., Buzzfeed, Popsugar and Ziff Davis—were barred in part by a 1907 Supreme Court ruling, Kessler v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:14 am by Dennis Crouch
The Federal Circuit panel's approach here follows the lead of KSR International Co., v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm
David O runs the federal blog and can be found downtown tying federal prosecutors up in knots. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 5:17 pm
This week the Supreme Court began hearing the oral argument for the case Davis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by Lyle Denniston
Monday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour or oral argument on Davis v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 12:47 pm by Law Offices of David P. Schwarz
Supreme Court ruling legalizing gay marriage – will proceed, but only against Davis in her individual capacity, a federal judge ruled. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:16 pm by Paul Caron
Wayfair, No. 17-494 (June 21, 2018) Michael Dorf (Cornell), Congress, the Dormant Commerce Clause, and the Wayfair Case Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), Wayfair As Federalism Decision Adam Thimmesch (Nebraska), South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:32 pm by Patent Docs
The panel will also discuss: • Recent important litigation victories for patent owners at the Federal Circuit, including Transocean v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
I’ve been thinking more about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 pm
Trial starts tomorrow in this case, but the defendant scored a win today, as Judge Davis affirmed Judge Love's report and recommendation that the defendant's motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's state law claims for infringement of state copyright law, violations of federal and state unfair competition and laws and conversion should be granted. [read post]