Search for: "Farrell v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
"One of the concerns noted by the Department was its risk of being sued if one of its employees made an arrest or injured an individual while working a second job.The Rivera case involves a similar situation (Rivera v Farrell, NYS Supreme Court, Justice Stallman, April 5, 2001, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]).Rivera, a New York City Department of Sanitation [DOS] supervisor, was "moonlighting" as an income tax advisor. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:06 pm by Bill Ward
The effect of the lies and bullying, and the strain on the community is evidenced by the recent settlement in the matter of Borough of Harvey Cedars v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
It appears from a review of the time records that 1.6 hours on 8 January 2007 was spent on preparation of the affirmation in support of counsel's fee, which is not compensable as held in Matter of Farrell. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:04 am by Hillary Frommer
For example the Appellate Division has held that the fact that a decedent registered to vote in a particular state does not mean that the decedent made that state his or her domicile (see Laufer v Hauge, 140 AD2d 671 [2d Dept 1988]; Matter of Estate of Gadway, 133 AD2d 83 [3d Dept 1987]). [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 29 June 2017 O’Farrell J ordered Kensington and Chelsea council to lift a ban on the media reporting on the first meeting of councillors to discuss the Grenfell Tower disaster, after a legal challenge by the Guardian and other media groups. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:09 pm
It stated that Thomson's research required a unique approach. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
"A discretionary change of venue under CPLR 510 (3) is addressed to the convenience of nonparty witnesses" (State of New York v Quintal, Inc., ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2010 NY Slip Op 09061 [2010] [emphasis added and citations omitted]; see State of New York v Slezak Petr. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]