Search for: "Federal Trade Commission v. Smith"
Results 141 - 160
of 294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Fenner andamp;andnbsp; Smith, 906 F. 2d 1206, 121 14 (8th Cir. 1990); andnbsp;Biggans v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:05 pm
Smith, an economist at the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:58 am
Background As we previously reported here, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) alleged that 1-800 engaged in unlawful restraints of trade, in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, by resolving trademark infringement allegations against competitors with settlement agreements that generally (1) prohibited the competitors from using certain advertising keywords, including 1-800’s name; and (2) required the competitors to use negative keywords to… [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:58 am
Background As we previously reported here, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) alleged that 1-800 engaged in unlawful restraints of trade, in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, by resolving trademark infringement allegations against competitors with settlement agreements that generally (1) prohibited the competitors from using certain advertising keywords, including 1-800’s name; and (2) required the competitors to use negative keywords to… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:46 pm
The Federal Trade Commission challenged the three companies involved in the two deals in 2001, claiming restraint of commerce under the FTC Act. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am
Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
CQG, Inc (Chicago IP Litigation) Wham-O – Defendant raises constitutional challenge to false marking statute before Federal Circuit: FLFMC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm
The Federal Trade Commission has announced the issuance of a new enforcement policy statement warning companies against using dark patterns that trick consumers into subscription services. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
” After Axon Enterprise acquired a competitor, it found itself subjected to antitrust review by the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech Engineering v Garth Living Pty Ltd (Patentology) (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Prison for infringement of IP rights in Australia! [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:53 am
Are independent actors setting the price or is the promoter supporting the secondary market for the asset or otherwise influencing trading? [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
On 13 December 2022, Saini J heard argument in the case of Smith v Talk Talk Telecom (QB-2020-003019). [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Department of Health and Human Services and the Federal Trade Commission prompted by 2006 media reports that Dumpsters behind certain CVS pharmacies contained pill bottles with patients' names, Social Security numbers and insurance information. [read post]
