Search for: "Federal v. Levine"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2010, 5:45 pm
Levine, 129 S. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 4:07 pm
Of course, we federalism supporters are still waiting for the other shoe -- Wyeth v Levine -- to drop. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:36 pm
Levine that held that federal law does not preempt state-law claims with regard to drug warning labels. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:46 am
Before Levine, quite a few cases – we can think of Buckman Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:14 am
Pease On July 16, 2013, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) issued an order finding Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”), Daniel Brin, Scott Connelly, Karen Levine, and Ryan Smith (together with Barclays, “Defendants”) in violation of FERC’s anti-manipulation regulations and assessed significant penalties.[1] The Defendants chose to have the validity of the order tried de novo in [...] [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Earlier this month, the SCOTUS granted cert in Pivotal Software v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:04 am
Levine. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:48 am
We don’t agree with Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:04 pm
Levine (20) [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 10:31 am
Joseph Herndon: Mitchell International v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:55 am
–Five v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:21 pm
Levine, No. 06-1249. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:50 pm
Remember what Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
FDA's regulation of prescription drugs is, as shown above, governed by a sweeping network of federal law individually applied to each drug. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
Levin to decide whether bankruptcy courts should apply a federal multi-factor test or an underlying state law when deciding whether to re-characterize a debt claim as equity. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
Levin to decide whether bankruptcy courts should apply a federal multi-factor test or an underlying state law when deciding whether to re-characterize a debt claim as equity. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
" Riegel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:49 am
In writing for the majority, Justice John Paul Stevens said it was possible for Wyeth to comply with both federal and state laws in this matter. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:23 am
The first of those cases, Levin v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 8:43 pm
This March, it overruled federal pre-emption of state law in Wyeth v. [read post]
