Search for: "Fish v. Government Employees"
Results 141 - 160
of 314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
English common law liability cases were governed by a somewhat confusing triad of duties. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 3:38 am
” This is no hyperbole, as shown by the opinion’s introductory summary of the operative facts: The Plaintiff, James Pogue, was an employee of the Defendant Hybrid Energy, Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:34 pm
The latest criminal bulletin includes a case of a German shipping company and its employees that did not record transfers of oily waste-water on the M/V Cornelia, a German-owned commercial vessel. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 2:28 pm
In fact, in Garnett v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 10:59 am
Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, in Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:57 am
Going “all-in” against the NLRB: How tribal self-government lost on the river in the Sixth Circuit [Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:26 am
Children, Youth and Families Department v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 9:16 am
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 10:08 am
Osier v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm
The Freshwater Fish Marketing Corp has filed a defamation claim against a critic who alleged the they sold fish that are not being inspected by government agents and could endanger human health. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
National Australian Bank, Ltd. governs whether a proposed application of the Alien Tort Statute would be impermis [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm
V, § 3(b)(10), Fla. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
September 29, 2015) — DC Circuit issued a unanimous ruling affirming the rejection of a lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club in which they argued that the federal government was obliged to conduct a NEPA analysis of the entirety of an 580 mile oil pipeline constructed by Enbridge Pipelines (FSP), LLC, holding that the federal government as not required to conduct a NEPA analysis of the entirety of the pipeline project. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:53 pm
The amendment overrules the holding in Rope v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
City of Paterson — whether the First Amendment bars the government from demoting a public employee based on a supervisor’s perception that the employee supports a political candidate Americold Logistics v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Lord Glennie did not consider that anything which had been pleaded in the present case created any sort of special circumstance where the director would be found personally liable for the company.He also considered the argument that Mr Emerson was jointly liable with Alba as tortfeasor because he either procured or assisted it in its wrongdoing (CBS Songs Ltd v Amstrad Consumer Electronics plc [1988] UKHL 15,Fish & Fish Ltd v Sea Shepherd UK [2015] UKSC10). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
Ryan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:57 pm
However, in the case of Krinitt v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
” So, what is this important government interest? [read post]
