Search for: "Fisher v. Best"
Results 141 - 160
of 332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
When people are offered a reward for hitting a goal, they are more likely to try their best to achieve it. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:20 pm
Why did the Supreme Court decide to take Fisher v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
” The case is City of Inglewood v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:09 pm
Second, the Court has shown no inclination to overrule outright the most recent ruling allowing the use of race in college admissions — its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:50 am
” Or, that was the best he could come up with, and it wasn’t much. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
To those who have been under a rock, Fisher v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
Also back this week is the duo of high-profile three-time relists arising from Fifth Circuit opinions with Judge Garza dissents: Fisher v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Vittoria Fiorenza of Pace won Best Prosecution Advocate Award. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
Hammon v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:05 pm
Burwell ObamaCare case [James Taranto, WSJ “Best of the Web”]. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:07 pm
At Monday’s oral arguments in ONEOK, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 10:13 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:29 am
” [Daniel Fisher, Forbes, whose own writing gets cited; opinion in Pearson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 11:50 am
U.S. case [WLF, ABA Journal, Daniel Fisher, earlier] Best line from a brief, via @ToddRuger: “More specifically, a false entry cannot be made in a fish. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
PollvogtThis is the final post in the Symposiumon Unconstitutional Animus.While the constitutional concept of animus was born in a case about discrimination against hippies, and was significantly elaborated in a case about persons with cognitive disabilities, since the Court’s 1996 decision in Romer v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
In State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:13 am
The same principle has been applied to applications to amend under section 75 of the 1977 Act: see Sara Lee Household & Body Care UK v Johnson Wax Ltd [2001] FSR 17 and DataCard Corp v Eagle Technologies Ltd [2011] EWHC 244 (Pat) at [226].105. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
In addition, the IPKat will publish the best submissions! [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
” As Lyle reported for this blog earlier in the week, Abigail Fisher has asked the full U.S. [read post]
