Search for: "Florian v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
The case has similarities to Chevron review in the United States, but without the subsequent developments like the analysis of whether policy is properly promulgated to the agencies, following West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 2:13 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to provide guidance (this post continues below the document):19-09-06 Sharp Letter Re. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:48 pm
Two weeks ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held a hearing on the damages award and underlying liability issues in the first Apple v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:13 am
Fortunately for Apple, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, while aware of what the media reported, will (have to) rule on a different basis.I don't disagree with Apple philosophically. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:36 pm
Int'l v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:47 pm
While Ericsson and Apple easily agreed upon David Folsom, former Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, as their mediator, the dispute isn't ripe for settlement. [read post]
12 May 2017, 3:30 pm
Qualcomm as well as two Apple v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:29 am
By contrast, in Oracle v. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 6:18 am
Ford Ame... by Florian MuellerThese are the five original SEPs-in-suit, which continue to be asserted:U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 10:57 pm
"Apple's smartphone market share in the Netherlands (26%) is far lower than in the United States, and the Dutch ACM very appropriately explains that mobile app developers are facing an Apple-Google duopoly (without using that term--at least I couldn't find in the summary).Finally, here's the Coring v. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 4:49 am
But it can't necessarily count on support from the courts.On Monday, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hold a case management conference relating to multiple App Store antitrust cases pending before her.Epic Games v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:50 am
Early (shortly after midnight) on Thursday, Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California somewhat surprisingly denied a renewed motion for a permanent injunction against Samsung that Apple had filed in December about a month after an appeals court had remanded a previously-denied injunction bid to the district court. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:38 am
Qualcomm's motion mentions complaints by Apple in the same district (Southern District of California) and "in the United Kingdom, China, Japan, and Taiwan. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:22 pm
One thing I do find interesting is that WilmerHale's Seth Waxman, the Solicitor General of the United States during President Clinton's second term and The American Lawyer's 2016 Intellectual Property Litigation Lawyer of the Year, is on the brief. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with the legal regulation of CSR in the United States and selected other states, with a focus on the law of charitable giving and the emerging disclosure and reporting laws4. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to grant a conventional antisuit injunction, even though there would actually be valid policy reasons to do so.On two other occasions, this blog accurately predicted antisuit injunctions barring patent holders from the overseas enforcement of SEP injunctions: Microsoft v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 4:44 am
A renegotiated license agreement is my best guess.Finally, here's the amended complaint: 14-10-03 Amended Microsoft v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:27 pm
The royalty base.Even Judge Robart held in the Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:02 am
However, the longer the whole Apple v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:35 pm
Stalling is something else: even though the Chief Justice of the United States had granted Samsung an extension until March 29 for a petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]
