Search for: "Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc" Results 141 - 160 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am by Mandelman
District Court for the Southern District of Florida charging attorney Mitchell J. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Plaintiff's principal argument on appeal was that the MMWA barred the provision mandating pre-dispute binding arbitration of her warranty claims against the Dealership. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:14 am
Rum production occurs throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, but it has been Cuban rum that has been the subject of decades'-long dispute, and two weeks ago, the subject a Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decision in Pernod Ricard USA LLC v Bacardi USA, Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
South Dakota’s statute also has a provision barring retroactive collection. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm by Adam C. Ragan
The Eleventh and Seventh Circuits followed with similar interpretations of the Act, buoying the defense bars in the TCPA plaintiff-heavy federal district courts of Florida and Illinois.[4] California defendants had no such luck. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
If they are found 51 percent at fault, they are barred entirely from recovery. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
            The Scope of Liability             In the Illinois Supreme Court case, Karas v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Colan Associates of Florida, LLC and The Jones Payne Group, Inc., of Mass., have agreed to pay $25,000 for alleged violations of the federal Clean Air Act and National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos. [read post]