Search for: "Floyd v. Floyd"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Extrinsic evidence of the intent of the parties of no moment in interpreting the terms of a contract
10 Nov 2008, 12:15 pm
Extrinsic evidence of the intent of the parties of no moment in interpreting the terms of a contractKito v Board of Educ. of William Floyd School Dist., 2008 NY Slip Op 08459, Decided on November 5, 2008, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentBernard J. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:05 am
However, Floyd LJ made two further points. [read post]
24 May 2017, 10:46 am
But his contempt decision in Patterson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:50 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 4:41 am
His 2017 win in Bristol Myers Squibb v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:28 am
William Floyd contended that [1] Mr. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:04 am
State Farm v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:58 am
Suspects Must Invoke Rights Unambiguously; Justice Sotomayer Strongly and Forcefully Dissents as High Court Narrows Miranda By: Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair Our last post dealt with the prospect that the Obama administration may modify the long-standing “public safety exception” of Miranda v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 5:09 pm
The facts of Comeaux crime were detailed by a Louisiana Court of Appeals in the matter of Smith v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:13 pm
The New York Law Journal’s recent article Challenge to Stop-and-Frisk Policy Begins before Scheindlin reported on the March 18th start of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York trial in Floyd v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:15 pm
Montejo v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 8:08 am
In the wake of Judge Shira Scheindlin’s ruling in Floyd v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:18 am
The JIPLP blog has a succinct online article, by Brian Whitehead and Richard Kempner, analysing Floyd J’s decision in Schütz (UK) Limited v Werit UK Limited, Protechna SA [2010] EWHC 660 on whether a defendant’s activities amounted to permissible repair or reconditioning of a patented product or infringement. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:20 am
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals had a recent opportunity in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:33 pm
Reynolds.Olson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:13 am
See: United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 12:17 pm
I haven't read this new white paper yet from the Media Law Resource Center (it's about 200 pages long), but it seems quite interesting; here's the Table of Contents [UPDATE: link to paper fixed]: Preface • iii Floyd Abrams Introduction and Executive Summary • 1 Chapter 1: A Response to Justice Thomas • 9 Matthew Schafer Chapter 2: A Response to Justice Gorsuch • 79 Richard Tofel and Jeremy Kutner Chapter 3: The Empirical Reality of Contemporary Libel… [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:46 pm
Laura von HerzenThe Court of Appeal (Floyd LJ, Kitchin LJ and Longmore LJ) held that there was no issue of principle which prevented the courts from exercising their discretion to grant declarations of the type postulated in Arrow Generics Ltd (i.e. declarations that a product was old or obvious in patent law terms at a particular date) in appropriate cases. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:46 pm
Laura von HerzenThe Court of Appeal (Floyd LJ, Kitchin LJ and Longmore LJ) held that there was no issue of principle which prevented the courts from exercising their discretion to grant declarations of the type postulated in Arrow Generics Ltd (i.e. declarations that a product was old or obvious in patent law terms at a particular date) in appropriate cases. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:24 pm
In Illinois v. [read post]
