Search for: "Floyd v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 761
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
On Friday, Floyd LJ gave the leading judgment (with which Patten and Tomlinson LJJ agreed) in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 290. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:13 am
In Lundbeck v Infosint [2011] EWHC 907 (Pat) (IPKat post here), Mr Justice Floyd observed in obiter that, according to the principles of novelty adopted in the UK courts, an overlapping range is novel solely on the basis that it is a narrower selection. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
 Moreover, this is really where it starts to get interesting.In the Court of Appeal decision relating to interim relief before the main trial before Arnold J, Floyd LJ had examined the proper interpretation of Swiss-form, second medical use claims (the present judgment states that this was at the behest of the parties: "The court was invited by both parties at that stage to decide the issue of law so that the parties knew where they stood for the purposes of the… [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
A defamation case against the Court of Appeals of Tennessee for defamatory comments made by a district attorney general came to a head in Floyd Rodney Burns v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:19 pm by Erin Napoleon
The legislation was introduced in response to ongoing nationwide protests against the killing of George Floyd, police brutality and systemic racism in the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Hunton Andrews Kurt Privacy & Information Security Law Blog had a post “EDPB Releases Statement on Restrictions on Data Subject Rights in Connection with the State of Emergency in Member States”. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:29 am by Karen Gullo
Demonstrators marched through San Francisco’s Union Square business and shopping district to protest Floyd’s murder and racist police violence. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am by Guest Blogger
The brother of George Floyd, Philonise Floyd, made an impassioned plea saying: “I am my brothers’ keeper. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
He cited Floyd J in Qualcom v Nokia , who said that “If the apparatus has to undergo physical modification before it can be used, then prima facie it is not suitable for use and does not infringe”. [read post]