Search for: "Force v. Department of Revenue" Results 141 - 160 of 694
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2022, 9:36 am by Daniel Jin
HB5200 – An Act Establishing a Task Force to Study Hydrogen Power – also passed both Chambers. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Bank of America — right to appeal the dismissal of a case that has been consolidated with another in the trial court Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
  Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the moratorium was not a “force majeure” extending the term of negotiated oil and gas leases. [read post]
Department of Justice has turned its spotlight on AMC Entertainment, Inc. in the government’s antitrust probe of the nation’s movie theater industry. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:46 pm by vforberger
TetraTech The Department of Justice’s newly-created solicitor general’s office represents both the Department of Revenue and the Department of Workforce Development in these cases. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:21 am
    Because the Court cavalierly rejected the regulation-spending distinction when reviewing state grant conditions in Wisconsin Department of Industry v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard… [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:05 pm by Amy Howe
Newton (April 16): Whether California’s overtime and wage laws apply to drilling rigs on the outer continental shelf under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Kate Howard
Department of Revenue for the State of Washington 16-308 Issue: Whether, or under what circumstances, imposing additional tax beyond the year preceding the legislative session in which the law was enacted violates due process. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm by Josh Blackman
  In the Amended Complaint, the Plaintiffs sued five defendants: (1) The United States of America, (2) the Department of Health and Human Services, (3) the Secretary of Health and Human Services, (4) the Internal Revenue Service, and (5) the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. [read post]