Search for: "Frank v. Securities " Results 141 - 160 of 1,950
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2010, 8:41 am by Securites Lawprof
When Courts and Congress Don’t Say What They Mean: Initial Reactions to Morrison v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:21 am by William McGrath
Gutpa violated the securities laws and that civil penalties under the Dodd-Frank Act should be applied, he could seek a review in the Court of Appeals. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:35 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Candidate at Harvard Law School, has published Private Securities Fraud Litigation after Morrison v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:02 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Pressure for aiding and abetting liability in private actions may arise once the Supreme Court decides Janus Capital Group v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Her Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower claim was also dismissed, and a third claim must be arbitrated (Wiggins v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:37 pm by Tamar Weinrib
Pursuant to Section 929Y of the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC solicited public comments back in October 2010 (and will conduct a study) to determine the extent to which private rights of action under the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws should be extended extraterritorially. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:54 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
This narrowed definition of who receives whistleblower protection — only those who first go to the SEC — excludes employees who only bring internal complaints and have not reported a securities violation to the SEC (Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:46 am by Patricia Hughes
In some cases, internal limits have been read into the guarantee, making it easier for government to justify the infringement (see, for example, Withler v. [read post]