Search for: "Freedom Holding Inc." Results 141 - 160 of 1,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
On 14 September 2020, Justice Thawley ruled that Facebook Inc was conducting business in Australia and collecting and holding personal information under s5B(2) of the Privacy Act 1988. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am by Josh Blackman
S., at 485–486; alterations omitted); Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
The post US appeals court holds employers can discriminate against employees who obtain abortions appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press then filed a motion to “unseal the appeals court’s order and all briefing in the case, including filings submitted by the government, Perry, and the U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Thus, for instance, the government cannot "afford[] a greater degree of protection to commercial than to noncommercial speech," Metromedia, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Kybow Holdings Ltd. dba Skimmerhorn Inn, 2022 BCCRT 622). [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm by Bernard Bell
May an agency revive a defunct rulemaking without notice, and then immediately promulgate a lightly revised version of the proposed rule as a final rule? [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
International – Compagnia Generale Distribuzione s.p.a. v Zorro Productions Inc). [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Capitol recommended Congress consider barring former President Trump from ever holding public office again as a result of his role inciting that day’s insurrection. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:40 am by Eleonora Rosati
International – Compagnia Generale Distribuzione s.p.a. v Zorro Productions Inc.).In delivering its new judgment in the long-running (15+ years and counting!) [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
There were three issues before the UK Supreme Court hearing a further appeal by Bloomberg: (1) Whether the Court of Appeal was wrong to hold that there is a general rule, applicable in the present case, that a person under criminal investigation has, prior to being charged, a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of information relating to that investigation. (2) Whether the Court of Appeal was wrong to hold that, in a case in which a claim for breach of confidence was not… [read post]