Search for: "G S David" Results 141 - 160 of 4,945
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm by centerforartlaw
Court’s Decision Based on the legal arguments presented, on November 24, 2023, Judge John G. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
 BlummHomewaters: A Human and Natural History of Puget Sound (2022) by David B. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:21 am by David Post
  Some of you may have seen the article by David Segal in the Sunday NY Times several weeks ago [available here] about a rather sordid copyright fracas in which I have been embroiled over the past few months. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 10:10 am by Giesela Ruehl
It contains 21 national and special reports written by a stellar group of authors: Martin Bernet (Bernet Arbitration/ Dispute Management, Switzerland) Pamela Bookman (Fordham University, United States) Michael Byrne (Dubai International Financial Centre Courts, Dubai), Tatiana Cardoso Squeff (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) Gustavo Cerqueira (University of Côte d’Azur, France) Edyta Figura-Góralczyk (Cracow University of Economics, Poland), David… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:25 am
Split Decision Music, LLC, Opposition No. 91249613 (January 31, 2024) [Not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David K. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:08 am
Supreme Court from 2004 to 2005 and for Judge David S. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[26]  In the Commission’s telling, “[a]s part of the settlement process, the Commission and a defendant negotiate terms,” and “if either party disagrees with terms t [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 10:13 am by Hayleigh Bosher
David Herbert Lawrence’s novel, Lady Chatterley’s Lover. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 7:49 am by Mark Graber
Bayard of Delaware and Representative Robert G. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am by CodeX
The significance of this technological disruption has been made clear through Chief Justice John Roberts’s Annual Report[6] at the end of 2023. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am by David Pocklington
None of the persons who submitted objections to the petition came within any of sub-paragraphs a) to (g) of rule 10.1 of the FJR 2015. [read post]