Search for: "GAME v. HOOKS"
Results 141 - 160
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
When Ed Blum brought Evenwel v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
When Ed Blum brought Evenwel v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm
I could reasonably be accused of being overoptimistic about norms, but good v. destructive/counterproductive/discriminatory/otherwise suboptimal are different things. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
Choiniere v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm
Last summer, in Espinoza v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 12:49 pm
For the People Theatres of NY, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:25 am
This, in turn, could free up local permits, which are often limited or capped by the local jurisdiction, for established players in the cannabis game. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has, in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Falkvinge amusingly noted that when it comes to such debates, “it’s not a logic game but a numbers game,” and “[i]t’s about looking like the winning team. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The problem, again, is that there is no legal hook for such a challenge, and the closest thing to a precedent on which they could rely has been repudiated both by the Supreme Court and by nearly every tax scholar (no matter their ideology) for more than half a century.That does not mean that the Supreme Court as currently constituted might not simply invent a new doctrine to save the billionaires who would pay increased taxes under this proposal. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The problem, again, is that there is no legal hook for such a challenge, and the closest thing to a precedent on which they could rely has been repudiated both by the Supreme Court and by nearly every tax scholar (no matter their ideology) for more than half a century.That does not mean that the Supreme Court as currently constituted might not simply invent a new doctrine to save the billionaires who would pay increased taxes under this proposal. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Is the game worth the candle? [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:35 am
Remember Rudovsky v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Game on, but with only a referee and no real players.The Majority Opinion in Wittmer v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Dawes off the hook (kinda) – the reformers in power in DC stripped Indians of their property rights without tribal consent (the cases of Lone Wolf v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 12:00 pm
This clause is the central hook for Barnett's argument. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:23 am
By Lene Powell, J.D.In a virtual reunion marking the Dodd-Frank Act’s 10th anniversary, the Act’s chief architects gathered in home offices and living rooms to celebrate successes, reflect on the current economic crisis, and mull remaining areas of reform. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 pm
Referring to such events as “accidents” subliminally lets the bad guy off the hook. [read post]
