Search for: "GENERAL CABLE CO."
Results 141 - 160
of 717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2011, 9:05 am
Bresnan Communications, LLC Cable One, Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:14 am
Chain & Cable Co., 531 F.2d 563, 567, 189 USPQ 420, 424 (CCPA 1976)). [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 12:38 pm
Hewlett-Packard Co. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
(Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., serves as co-counsel to the petitioner.) [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
Drexan applied to the Federal Court for a declaration that the latter two persons were co-inventors of the heating cable described in CA 2,734,561 and to vary the records of the Patent Office to show that result. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:44 am
” (See Multi-Channel TV Cable Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:44 am
” (See Multi-Channel TV Cable Co. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:49 pm
Specifically, the cable states: Refugees: The U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:38 am
(formerly CTV Globemedia Inc.), V Interactions Inc., Newfoundland Broadcasting Co. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:48 pm
The engineers’ submission—signed by such experts as Vint Cerf, co-designer of the Internet’s fundamental protocols; Mitch Kapor, a personal computer industry pioneer and EFF co-founder; and programmer Sarah Allen, who led the team that created Flash video—sets the record straight about how the Internet works and how rolling back net neutrality would have disastrous effects on Internet innovation. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:58 pm
Canada Co. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:32 am
— Generative AI models raise challenging questions regarding copyright law. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:55 am
I thought I’d add his essay to the mix for the superb round up of guests my co-blogger Gerard gathered together this week. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:01 pm
As I noted an amicus brief I co-authored in the “Apple vs. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:17 pm
But to me, it felt like an oldies show on an obscure cable channel. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 8:15 am
Ct.); Universal Cable Prods., LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral rights famous… [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
Next, the Court ruled that because the Aereo service was offered to the general public, it amounts to a public performance within the meaning of the Copyright Act. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:36 am
There are limits on how many broadcast TV and radio stations that one person can own locally or nationally, and also there have been limits on co-ownership of broadcast stations and newspapers, cable systems, or phone systems. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:01 am
“On or about 15 September 2009,” Time Warner Cable's Subpoena Compliance Team, wrote Tillery and informed him that the IP Address at issue was assigned to Bernard. [read post]
