Search for: "GILES V US"
Results 141 - 160
of 430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm
The case before us does not turn on any of this and we had no evidence to explain in detail how Ms Wilson came to make her choice. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
We have seen such agreements raised before, for instance in London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB), Lambeth LBC v Thomas (1997) 30 HLR 89 and Rochdale MBC v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:51 pm
The post When to call it a day… by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 1:30 pm
Thomas v Lambeth LBC, County Court at Central London, 16 March 2017 This is a s.204 appeal in the County Court of a vulnerability decision by Lambeth. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 11:19 am
NRAM plc v X [Name redacted by request]. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:02 pm
Court v Van Dijk & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 483 Nuisance cases are tricky. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
Panayiotou v Waltham Forest and Smith v Haringey. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm
Could a less intrusive policy have been used? [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm
That left Di Palma v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR CD149 and Wood v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR CD69, both of which found court as public authority not an issue when the court “merely provided a forum for the determination of the civil right in dispute between the parties”. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm
The problem here was the high threshold of evidence set out in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 218 (Admin), reported at [2014] ICR 498, R (Tabbakh) v Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 827, and the second Unison case, R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor (No. 2) [2014] EWHC 4198 (Admin). [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:28 pm
Again) by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:37 pm
Let us just pause there for a moment and take stock. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm
There may have been good reasons why it was not practicable to leave the appellant where he was and put the alternative accommodation in the same road to the use to which it was wished to put his flat. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Let us take an example to see why. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm
Clark v Manchester City Council [2015] UKUT 129 (LC) Mr Clark had a licence for an HMO for not more than 5 occupants. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 1:44 pm
The adjective used by Gage LJ was not “credible” but “cogent”. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:59 am
Southwark’s form for internal use by housing options officers. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:22 pm
Poplar Housing & Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Begum & Ors [2017] EWHC 2040 (QB) We are no fans of illegal subletting of social housing here at NL. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:01 pm
Giles v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:44 pm
Supreme Court’s 1884 opinion in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Company v. [read post]
