Search for: "Gaines v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 141 - 160 of 184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
Poynter’s Craig Silverman flags up a podcast in which he talks about online verification and corrections with Journalism.co.uk’s Rachel McAthy. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am by Rosalind English
Based as it is on a delicate balance between reciprocity and self-interest, the right to sue in nuisance corrects the democratic deficit in most environmental regulation. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:28 pm by Rick Hasen
  Professor Hasen has masterfully described this trend, showing how political parties seek to gain advantage through election recounts, voter id laws, absentee ballot procedures, and the like. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
The first witness during the Monday morning hearing was DAC Sue Akers, QPM, a deputy assistant commissioner of the Metropolitan Police. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by INFORRM
  Mr Pell’s answer – the damages awarded by Tugendhat J in Cambridge v Makin – was also correct. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
No. 09–0724 CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT and EMC INSURANCE COMPANIES v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:19 am
The details are different, but every GOP candidate has attacked federal judges for decades (ever since, at least, Brown v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
" This morning the Court of Justice gave its ruling in Joined Cases C 446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd, Röhlig Belgium NV and Nokia Corporation and and C 495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs, International Trademark Association intervening. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
This week, the Supreme Court will consider the linked appeals of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs which are to be heard on Wednesday 6 and Thursday 7 July 2011 by Lords Hope, Walker, Mance, Clarke and Wilson. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am by Michael O'Brien
That procedure involves five steps: At Step One, the Commissioner considers whether the claimant is engaged in "substantial gainful activity. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am by INFORRM
The CPS view was that the observations of Lord Woolf were correct, and accorded with the rationale of the prohibition in section 1 (1). [read post]