Search for: "Gaines v. Gaines"
Results 141 - 160
of 14,752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2023, 10:07 am
In the upcoming Supreme Court case of Moore v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 10:07 am
In the upcoming Supreme Court case of Moore v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
N.A., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
In a posting last December I wrote about an important estate tax case, Jelke v Commissioner, in which a federal appeals court adopted a bright-line rule requiring 100% discount for built-in capital gains tax ("BIG") in the valuation of C corporation assets. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 4:52 pm
In Liu v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 4:48 am
While the parish has not formally dissociated itself from the Episcopal Church, the complaint (full text) in Protestant Episcopal Church of the Diocese of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
27 May 2018, 2:05 pm
(U.S.S.C., March 20, 2018, Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:26 pm
" SEC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 5:37 am
In the case of In re Estate of Gaines, 262 S.W.3d 50 (Tex. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 2:33 am
Act does not operate to curb enterprise zone losses Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Smallwood Court of Appeal “Section 41(2) of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 did not operate to restrict allowable losses that would otherwise have accrued in respect of a taxpayer's units in an enterprise zone property unit trust when he received distributions that gave rise to a deemed disposal under section 122 of that Act. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:31 pm
Jenkins v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
When are capital gains included in a parent's income for child support in Tennessee? [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
When can a party receive investment gains when dividing a retirement account in Tennessee? [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 6:44 pm
This week the Supreme Court denied cert for a case that sought to chip away at the rights gained for LGBTQ+ people in Obergefell v Hodges. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:40 pm
There was no way to gain access from underneath the sign. [read post]
29 May 2008, 1:36 am
Regina (HSMP Forum Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench Division “The introduction of a new and more restrictive regime for highly skilled immigrants was unlawful because it prejudiced people already admitted to the UK under an earlier regime by reducing their opportunity to gain permanent rights of residency. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 8:17 pm
Supreme Court decision in McCullen v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 6:55 pm
In the Matter of Frydman v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:15 am
Witness the denial of en banc rehearing in Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
When a retirement account is divided in a Tennessee divorce, does it include the investment gains or losses until the account is actually divided? [read post]
