Search for: "Gant v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 559
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2011, 10:27 pm
In his concurring opinion, Justice Gants relied on several out of state cases to suggest that the police should be required to consider practical alternatives prior to impounding a vehicle. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:02 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Arizona v Gant, 556 U.S. ___, 129 S Ct 1710, 173 L Ed 2d 485 (2009), which abrogated the well-established rule in New York v Belton, 453 U.S. 454; 101 S Ct 2860; 69 L Ed 2d 768 (1981) and its progeny, we must consider whether an officer's good faith reliance on case law that is later overturned may form a proper basis to avoid the operation of the exclusionary rule. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:02 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Gant (2009) 556 U.S. 332 (Gant), which narrowed the scope of permissible warrantless vehicle searches incident to a driver’s arrest. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 6:11 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
In New York v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
It began by discussing the prior case of State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
It began by discussing the prior case of State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 2:03 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the case of Arizona v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 4:15 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:15 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 10:24 am
Gant is an appeal to the United States Supreme Court from an Arizona trial court in which the trial court had denied a motion to suppress evidence that had been acquired during a search of the defendant’s car after the defendant was placed under arrest and confined in the patrol car.The US Supreme Court reversed the Arizona trial court’s ruling and remarked in its ruling that a search incident to arrest be justified by either the interest in officer safety or the… [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 4:29 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:20 pm
State v. [read post]
CA6: In SI, it is how defendant could have got to part of car searched, not how officer actually did
7 May 2011, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
The Facts of State v. [read post]
