Search for: "Gatt v. Gatt"
Results 141 - 160
of 192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm
First, the panel in the Japan v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
What is the continued relevance in this context of the direct v. indirect taxation distinction? [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 6:42 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2006, 2:20 pm
Myers v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
The claim was brought under the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, not GATT, so GATT’s Article XX allowing an exception for actions “necessary to protect human, animal or plant life or health” didn’t apply.Panel rejected Indonesia’s claim that the ban was unnecessary to protect public health. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm
The passage makes for a curious mix of transatlantic policy objectives in the areas of steel sector decarbonization, carbon border adjustments, trade defence instruments, and inbound investment screening: Compatible with international obligations and the multilateral rules, including potential rules to be jointly developed in the coming years, each participant in the arrangements would undertake the following actions: (i) restrict market access for non-participants that do not meet conditions of… [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce Elliott… [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm
There was a statement in open court in the case of Michael Turner v MGN Ltd before the same judge. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:18 pm
The WTO Appellate Body in US-Zeroing (EC), US-Zeroing (Japan), US-Stainless Steel (Mexico), US-Continued Zeroing (EC) found denial of offsets for non-dumped comparisons in antidumping duty administrative reviews to be inconsistent with Article 9.3 of the Antidumping Agreement and Article VI:2 of the GATT 1994, either ``as such,'' or ``as applied'' in certain administrative reviews, or both.\6\ In US-Zeroing (Japan), the WTO Appellate Body also found denial of… [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:10 am
See, e.g., Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:22 am
" With regard to panels providing a "basic rationale," an Annex entitled "Agreed Description of the Customary Practice of the GATT in the Field of Dispute Settlement" says the following in para. 6(v): "Panel reports have normally set out findings of fact, the applicability of relevant provisions, and the basic rationale behind any findings and recommendations that it has made. [read post]
Patent Term Adjustment and Obviousness-Type Double Patenting: Cellect’s Bid for Supreme Court Review
14 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
In Novartis AG v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 5:55 am
What is the continued relevance in this context of the direct v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 7:10 pm
Importação paralela de produtos Importar produtos originais, sem consentimento do titular da marca, é válido? [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 7:10 pm
Importação paralela de produtos Importar produtos originais, sem consentimento do titular da marca, é válido? [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
If parties or WTO panels want a formal, legal hook within the WTO to allow for such reference to an FTA (the way they looked for one in DSU Art. 3.10), GATT Article XXIV, GATS Article V and the Enabling Clause provide such hook. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 2:38 pm
by Dennis Crouch Acadia Pharms v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 8:12 am
On the contrary, in US – Softwood Lumber V (Article 21.5 – Canada), the Appellate Body emphasized the exceptional nature of the W-T comparison methodology. 395 In US – Zeroing (Japan), the Appellate Body stated that "[t]he asymmetrical methodology in the second sentence is clearly an exception to the comparison methodologies which normally are to be used. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:12 am
K 4600 R35 2011 Recognition and regulation of safeguard measures under GATT/WTO / Sheela Rai. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
However, such an approach not only raises the issue of eroding the rule-making powers of the entire Membership, but could lead to the resurgence of GATT a la carte approach which was the hallmark of the Tokyo Round (1974-1979). [read post]
