Search for: "General Motors Corporation v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
The Corporate Abuse at the Heart of Concepcion The Concepcion case involves the widespread corporate practice of using standard-form contracts to ban class actions. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s like saying that, because Ford Motor Co. has published corporate histories in its name, sponsors Masterpiece Theater, and creates extensive social media content, “Ford Motor Company” is now a title for Rogers purposes, or that the existence of The Texas Rangers: The Authorized History or The Code: An Authorized History of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codemakes those entities into titles for Rogers purposes. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 11:14 am by Diane Marie Amann
Livingston (1964), and further declined to privilege what the Court in Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
The fortunes of the General Motors Corporation and the Ford Motor Company, two of the world's largest auto makers and two of this country's largest employers, have risen and fallen many times over the last 50 years. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 12:04 pm by Ilya Somin
Yesterday, General Motors announced the planned closing of five plants in the US and Canada. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:49 am
App. at 553) The general rule throughout the United States is that an officer of a corporation who takes part in the commission of a tort of gross negligence or reckless indifference by the corporation may be personally liable. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Louisiana Supreme Court – overturning huge state attorney general verdict in statutory quasi-class action·                     Graphic Communications Local v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 8:39 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Northshore University Healthsystem, and earlier in American Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:33 am by Mark S. Sidoti and Jessica A. Huse
Midvale Corporation, which found generally that telephone helplines are not acceptable auxiliary aids to address otherwise inaccessible retail websites. [read post]