Search for: "General Ship Corp. v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2011, 7:14 am
In 1927 the United States Supreme Court decided Robins Dry Dock and Repair Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
McKesson Corp., No. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
And that value was as important for the Chinese, Russians, and second tier group of American-wary states, as it now appears to be to the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:47 am
Ct. at 2498 (quoting Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 7:47 am
On Jan. 21, the Japanese Mission to the United Nations presented the U.N. secretary-general a note verbale arguing that China’s claims violate the U.N. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Mason, 527 F.3d 252, 255 (2d Cir. 2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:24 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
The United States Supreme Court vacated and shipped the case back to California for reconsideration in light of Concepcion. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 1:07 pm
In the east, the military will deploy a state-of-the-art anti-ship missile system and more new drones. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dispatched this argument by citing Neal v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
It did not market its machines in New Jersey or ship them there. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
United States and its progeny? [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Not to be taken lightly (Class 99) British government clowning around with patents – but noone’s laughing - ‘New 10% tax on income from patents to boost science development’ (IPKat) (IAM) It’s certainly not contaminated by cheese: Illegal to make Stilton cheese in Stilton (Trademark Blog) United States US General US Government Accountability Office reviews US overseas IP Attaches (IP Watch) ITC gets the thumbs up – Patent World… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm
Wong and United States v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:20 am
In that connection, I should note the Microsoft case (United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
McKesson Corp., 219 P.3d 749, 770 (Cal. 2009) (wrongful discharge) ($1,900,000); Walker v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw the controversial "Waters of the United States" proposal. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:54 am
Under the Clean Water Act, these agencies have dual regulatory authority to protect “waters of the United States” and “adjacent wetlands. [read post]
