Search for: "Gill v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2017, 6:57 am by Jennifer Davis
(R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ¶ 77, supra.). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At The Hill, Lydia Wheeler reports that next term’s partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a case on next term’s docket, and United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
In Time, Thomas Wolf observes that the court’s ruling in Gill v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 16-7835 Issue: Whether a state court can enforce a rule that Brady v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
’” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that the court may decide as early as today not only whether to grant review in Gill v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court will decide next term whether the Fourth Amendment requires that the government obtain a warrant for historical records showing where a cell phone connects with towers, observing that the case calls on the justices to “puzzle over the implications of an 18th-century rule for a distinctly 21st-century reality. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
At Governing, Alan Greenblatt discusses how the “’efficiency gap,’” which “works by looking at how many votes for one party are wasted,” may provide “the missing piece for complainants” seeking to “statistically prove intent when it comes to partisan gerrymanders” like the one at issue in Gill v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: In The New York Times, Adam Liptak looks at Gill v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
A RULING in the latest hearing of the Heather Capital case by three judges at the Court of Session has granted proof hearings against law firms Levy & Mcrae and Burness Paul LLP.The decision is bound to be an uncomfortable one for Scotland’s senior judges as the case has direct links back to the judiciary itself, revealed when Lord President Lord Brian Gill was forced to suspend Sheriff Peter Black Watson after Watson was named in a writ launched by Heather Capital’s… [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
  In the 1970s, identification of the virus, and development of serologic tests helped differentiate hepatitis A from other types of non-B hepatitis.[5] Until 2004, HAV was the most frequently reported type of hepatitis in the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:42 am
United States of America), 2008 Alfred Boll, Nottebohm (Lichtenstein v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:50 am by Quinta Jurecic
Lewis was among those legal advisors disqualified by the order: “We just stopped working on anything involved with United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:09 pm by Bill Marler
Outbreaks of enteric virus illness in the United States: requisite for development of viral guidelines. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
From the Jimeno decision:The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
From the Jimeno decision:The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. [read post]