Search for: "Gillett v. Gillett" Results 141 - 160 of 369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2013, 4:18 am by Barry Sookman
The first is Unilever Plc v Gillette (UK) Ltd [1989] RPC 583, 609, where Mustill LJ said that, in order to show that a defendant was secondarily liable for infringement of a patent, “there [was no] need for a common design to infringe”, as it was “enough if the parties combine to secure the doing of acts which in the event prove to be infringements”. [read post]
19 May 2013, 8:37 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
V S Naipaul, not a man given to offering easy praise, described it as ‘one of the finest and most finished books to come out of the West Indies. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 8:14 am by Bart Torvik
 Anyone who thinks the "platinum coin" solution to the Debt Ceiling is obviously legal needs to read Bloomington Nat'l Bank v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:19 am by Adam Gillette
  We were assigned to read the Case of the Thorns (or Hulle v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 11:26 am by admin
Read the opinion on rehearing here: Gillette v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 9:46 am
Co. v Gillette Co., 64 NY2d 304, 311 [1984] [citations omitted]). [read post]