Search for: "Givens v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 141 - 160
of 444
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2020, 5:18 am
Given the many accusations that the virus is human-made, escaped from a laboratory or was part of a biological weapon (BW) programme and the ease with which disinformation circulates through the social media, an initiative that relies on the BTWC makes sense. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:47 am
Naramore v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:02 am
Given everything that has transpired over the years, we cannot revisit the application of these standard practices regarding the publication of judicial decisions and orders in social security matters. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
Internet and Social Media It is reported that a number of virtual private network providers in the U.S. and Canada have shut down their servers in Hong Kong, citing concerns over the national security law. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Today the European Court of Justice (CJEU) published its highly anticipated judgement in the case of Data Protection Commissioner Ireland v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems, colloquially known as “Schrems 2.0”. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm
Discrimination can of course occur on a wide variety of fronts including, but not limited to, employment, education, housing and insurance…, not to mention on a social level. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
We had a post dealing with some of the evidence given in the first week. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm
“It’s a sad reality that there is no uniform First Amendment-compliant policy nationwide that all law enforcement officers follow [when] they respond to journalists who are covering social or civil unrest,” RTDNA’s Shelley told me. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
, At Mount Rushmore, Trump exploits social divisions, warns of ... [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
Our founders boldly declared that we are all endowed with the same divine rights, given us by our Creator in Heaven, and that which God has given us, we will allow no one ever to take away — ever.There's "ever" again — and in connection with God and "divine truth. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
Koppelman accuses me of being too forgiving of the civil rights commissioner in Masterpiece and of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:25 am
Mr I was given second highest band priority. [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am
On May 24, 1937, the Supreme Court decided in two separate but related cases that the Social Security Act of 1935 was constitutional. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:57 pm
It includes the American Coronavirus/COVID-19 Election Safety and Security Act, or ACCESS Act. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
