Search for: "Givens v. Hill"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2009, 6:50 am
"Reasonableness review" under the abuse of discretion standard is a steep hill to climb for a sentence vacation and remand.Musladin v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
Hernandez should have been given a chance to build his case and climb what is almost always the very steep hill toward post conviction relief. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 12:17 pm
In today’s case (Ormiston v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 11:20 am
Ancillary questions B. 535 wildcards V. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
In the cases of Clarke v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 9:28 am
In Wilson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:39 am
Attorneys are given the benefit of the doubt in many “strategic” decisions. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Mr Sheikh had borrowed £50,000 from Notting Hill Finance in January 2018. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:10 am
Supp. 2d 233, 253 n.14 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) and as connoting a racial meaning, see Hill v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:47 pm
The Supreme Court's decision last year in Ledbetter v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
’ Hill v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
Green is an adversarial hearing within the Sand Hill Capital Partners III, LLC bankruptcy. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
People v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:53 am
You can read Whitey Bulger’s indictment here: Third Superseding Indictment (U.S. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 2:37 am
In a case which has more of the surreal about it, Kenneth Parker QC, sitting then as a Deputy Judge, had to decide whether to grant leave to a litigant in person to challenge Octavia Housing and Care’s allocations policy as it applied to that particular litigant in person (who did not challenge the lawfulness of Octavia’s lettings policy [and by extension, Locata, the West London sub-regional CBL scheme to which Octavia Hill subscribes]): R(Fidelis-Auma)… [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:56 am
In Vincent Ofor v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
I mean, sure, it may be a crime, but do we really care all that much if a guy takes a little water that's flowing off of a big hill near some railroad tracks? [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:41 pm
Oakland’s enforcement policy is therefore a content-based regulation of speech.Sounds quite right to me, given Hill. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:53 am
Borello & Sons, Inc v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
