Search for: "Goff v. Goff" Results 141 - 160 of 184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2011, 5:25 am by Susan Brenner
The first, `Is this Carolyn Goff,’ was received at 1:05 a.m. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:56 am by Jonathan Bailey
Prince Case First off today, the Lenz v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm by Simon Gibbs
In Barratt Goff & Tomlinson v HMRC (see judgment) it was held where medical reports or medical records were obtained by solicitors, for the purpose of personal injury claims, the solicitors did not need to charge VAT on the fee as they were to be treated as being disbursements, as opposed to being part of the legal services being provided. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:42 am by Jonathan Bailey
The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a rel=”nofollow” href=”http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/”>Creative Commons Attribution License. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:58 am by Russ Bensing
Good news for Megan Goff, too. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 10:05 am by Jonathan Bailey
The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:00 am by Gordon Firemark
Dora the Explorer Suit settled Supreme Court Denies Cert in Harper (innocent infringer) file sharing case Maverick Recordings v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:58 am by Jonathan Bailey
Tune in every Wednesday evening at 6 PM ET for the live recording of the Copyright 2.0 Show or wait and get the edited version Friday right here on Plagiarism Today.The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:59 pm by INFORRM
This principle was based on the 1982 case of Schering Chemicals v Falkman [1982] 1 QB. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:40 pm by Simon Gibbs
  The Law Society is to make written submissions in a forthcoming VAT tribunal case on this issue in Barratt Goff & Tomlinson (BGT) v The Commissioners for HMRC. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:29 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday.1: No, You Don’t Own It: Court Upholds EULAs, Threatens Digital ResaleFirst off today, in the case of Vernor v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 7:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
These were two of the major claims made by defendants in the Righthaven suits, which now number approximatley 120.3: Forever 21 v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am by INFORRM
The significance of Lord Goff’s approach was, however, appreciated by Laws J in Hellewell v Chief Constable ([1995] 1 WLR 804). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 7:48 am by On the Net
Wealth Strategies just published the first of a six part series on lesser known trusts written by attorney Wendy Goffe. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm
For example, in 1958, a California court allowed a physician to testify about what nurses should have done saying, "Surely a qualified doctor would know what was standard procedure of nurses to follow" (Goff v Doctor's Hospital, 166 CalApp2d 314, 319 [1958]). [read post]