Search for: "Gonzales v. State of California" Results 141 - 160 of 256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2018, 2:46 am by Scott Bomboy
And Georgetown Law professor Randy Barnett, who argued a major case about marijuana at the Supreme Court, Raich v Gonzales, said on his Twitter account that “this is entirely different than Raich, which did not authorize Congress to tell California what its medical marijuana policy must be. [read post]
Supreme Court later upheld this federal law, the Controlled Substances Act, or CSA, against a challenge contending that Congress did not have the power to regulate local, medicinal marijuana possession and use in 2003, in the well-known Gonzales v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Timothy Bonis
Raich (where the Court bent the Tenth Amendment to prohibit marijuana cultivation that was legal in California), the similar 2006 decision Gonzales v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 5:28 pm
Department Of State Website, usinfo.state.gov, Accessed 5/14/08) And The Supreme Court Has Upheld Regulations On Medical Marijuana: In Gonzales v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:30 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Daniel Cotter looks at the recent decision in Opati v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Includes witnesses with “knowledge of any discoverable matter” . . . i.e., fact or opinion [Gonzales v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Includes witnesses with “knowledge of any discoverable matter” . . . i.e., fact or opinion [Gonzales v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:53 am
State of California Racks Up $1.8M in Fees and Counting The Recorder A California appeals court judge had little sympathy for the state of California last week, affirming $307,000 in attorney fees for a woman who had been granted nearly $1.5 million in fees earlier in the case over enforcement of a ballot measure concerning prison inmate wages. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court considers whether to enforce the Second Amendment right to "bear arms" in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
Justice Stevens himself is the author of the Court’s decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:50 am by Nabiha Syed
Gonzales and Tibbals v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:04 pm
Hibbs -- upholding the Family and Medical Leave Act Gonzales v. [read post]