Search for: "Good Inc" Results 141 - 160 of 28,606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2015, 3:30 am by Natasha Chetty
You might feel like a good or important person when you listen to them. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:52 am by sally
Les Laboratoires Servier and another v Apotex Inc and others [2012] EWCA Civ 593; [2012] WLR (D) 138 “The court was able to take into account a wide range of considerations in order to ensure that the ex turpi causa defence only applied where it was a just and proportionate response to the illegality in question. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:46 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Baptist Hosps., Inc.: Medical Malpractice Cases appeared first on Boston Personal Injury Attorney Blog. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:04 am
Switzerly, Inc. sought to register the mark GOOD BOX for wine, but the USPTO refused registration, deeming the mark merely descriptive of the goods under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 5:13 pm
Yep, affirmed: marks virtually identical, and goods related, both inherently and in view of third-party registration evidence. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:04 pm
Ben Reznik From Robert Stein, President Gambol Industries, Inc. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:48 am by sally
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Delta Air Lines Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 162; [2011] WLR (D) 60 “Notwithstanding the difficulties which could arise in cases where the technology was complex, it should not be assumed that summary judgment was not for patent disputes; the general rules as to summary judgment applied equally to patent cases as to other types of case and where the technology was relatively simple to understand, and the court was able, on summary application, to form a confident… [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 10:05 am
French luxury group Hermes International has launched legal action against online auctioneer eBay Inc. over the sale of counterfeit goods on its pages, weekly Challenges magazine reported. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:27 am
In re Don’t Run Out, Inc., Serial No. 87344127 (October 31, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Angela Lykos).When the involved goods are identical in part, a lesser degree of similarity between the marks  is needed to support a finding of likelihood of confusion. [read post]