Search for: "Good v. Martin" Results 141 - 160 of 1,419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2017, 12:48 pm
 Like I said, it took me a good five minutes of searching to actually figure it out.It's him.You might say:  "But Professor Martin, how are you certain? [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am by Joseph L. Hyde
  In that case, then Chief Justice Martin criticized the common law as perpetuating & [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 12:48 am by Ben Vernia
The Tax Court next addressed the accuracy-related penalties the IRS had imposed, concluding that they should have been imposed on the omission of his share (because he knew of the Roco decision, but that he had relied in good faith on the 11th Circuit decision (which the Supreme Court had overruled two years later, in Commissioner v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:58 am by Eric Goldman
Lewis’ lawyer is Andrew Lee Martin of Colorado, a/k/a “drewmesq@aol.com. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
Bruen’s gaslighting on both points is a harbinger for changes to come to First Amendment doctrine … Whether the Court’s conservative wing will make good on their dramatic reimagining of the First Amendment in … [this case] remains to be seen. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:51 am by Jeralyn
Alternet had a good round-up a few years ago of memorable quotes from Dr. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
Where an ad is literally false, the court has the power enjoin the use without reference to the impact of the ad on the buying public (McNeil-PCC v Bristol-Myers Squibb)(1991)). [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:11 pm by John Lewis
Only days after issuing the Hamrick opinion, the Eleventh Circuit was again confronted with questions surrounding the FAA Section 1 exemption, in Martins v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:52 am
Martin will review the use of IP causes of action while Justin focuses on defamation and malicious falsehood, these being causes of action frequently overlooked by IP practitioners. [read post]