Search for: "Good v. Roy"
Results 141 - 160
of 451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2023, 11:02 am
Roy Harness and Kamal Karriem are Black men living in Mississippi who are disenfranchised under state law because they have been convicted of forgery and embezzlement. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm
Limitation Periods On paper, the ROI Act and the Defamation Act 1996 (which remains in force in Northern Ireland) both apply a one-year limitation period to defamation claims (although the ROI limit can be extended to two years in exceptional circumstances). [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:56 am
* Bidding on your own trademarks. 1-800 Contacts makes a big point that trademark owners get higher ROIs from bidding on their own trademarks, e.g. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm
Citing an IARC monograph may be in itself questionable, given the IARC’s deviations from good systematic review practice. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 7:45 pm
Category: ITC By: Roy Rabindranath, Contributor TItleAlign Tech., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 5:36 am
., blog proprietor, is breathlessly covering all aspects of USA v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:29 am
Our first reaction to Zeman v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:01 pm
Roy Estes got stabbed to death in the desert. [read post]
Bilski v. Kappos: SCOTUS Doesn't Recognize Business Methods Patents But Doesn't Prohibit Them Either
28 Jun 2010, 12:07 pm
See Le Roy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
Roy, [2015] O.J. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm
I’ll be out of town for a good chunk of this week so no email edition will run. [read post]
17 May 2021, 3:44 pm
DESKTOP V. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 7:36 am
Accord Banks v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:14 am
The case is Massey v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:22 am
[Readers: Quirky Question # 108 was posed to my colleague, Jennifer Good, in our Denver office. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 7:52 am
Paul Secunda of the Workplace Prof Blog has some good analysis of the oral argument transcript here, and Roy Harmon on the Health Plan Law blog has analysis here and here. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:25 am
Roy [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
An important Court of Appeals case I would blog if I had more time: Primary assumption of risk does not apply to children since they cannot understand the risks of what they are doing Thankfully, Roy Mura at Coverage Counsel had the time to write up Trupia v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:21 pm
In Ralston v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:38 am
Laracuente v. [read post]
