Search for: "Good v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 45,153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
Patel confirmed this as a good term for Fourth Amendment rights, joining Grady v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 6:33 am
Here is the petition: Zylena R v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:28 pm
DISMISSED – Order to Show Cause, State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
I spent a good part of last October writing about federal preemption of state tort claims, including talking about the case of Wyeth v Levine. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:10 am
See Collier v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:03 am
Now, in a different case raising similar issues, the United States Supreme Court will have an opportunity to resolve a circuit split on the parody goods question. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 10:27 am
However, the case is well set up for the State's appeal of this issue, so good work on the part of the Collin County appellate prosecutors. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 5:49 pm
There is no such thing as a “good” review of LMRA preemption. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
Markus v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:34 am
Even without advertising, Plotkin appears to have good access to the Astorian’s audience. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:10 pm
The Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:47 am
Othman (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 290; [2008] WLR (D) 103 “The deportation of a foreign national on the ground that his presence was not conducive to the public good because he was a danger to the national security of the United Kingdom would breach that person's right to a fair trial under art 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms if in the receiving… [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:35 am
This is not good for a couple of reasons. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 10:11 pm
This week on The Good Wife: the BigLaw v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm
Yesterday, I attended oral arguments in the Supreme Court case of McBurney v. [read post]
