Search for: "Government's Motion"
Results 141 - 160
of 30,038
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2024, 4:15 am
Husband dropped his request for equitable distribution after his motion for summary judgment was denied. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:28 pm
And open government organizations, like EFF client Public.Resource.Org, use technical standards incorporated into law to share knowledge about the law. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
The trial judge denied the motions, and the case proceeded to trial. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:47 am
(As usual with such decisions on a motion to dismiss, the court assumed that the facts were as plaintiff alleged them to be; the case will now go on to discovery, and then perhaps to a trial where a jury will decide the facts.) [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"The concept of the separation of powers is the bedrock of the system of government adopted by this State in establishing three coordinate and coequal branches of government, each charged with performing particular functions. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"The concept of the separation of powers is the bedrock of the system of government adopted by this State in establishing three coordinate and coequal branches of government, each charged with performing particular functions. [read post]
15 May 2024, 5:43 am
The court disagreed with the government’s argument. [read post]
15 May 2024, 4:51 am
District Judge Maryellen Noreika refused the motion, saying, “I trust everyone can get done what needs to be done. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:32 am
With the government resting after Cohen’s cross examination, I believe that an honest judge would have no alternative but to grant a motion for a directed verdict and end the case before it goes to the jury. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
District concluded that the facts had not yet been sufficiently establishing the complaint and other allowable sources at the motion to dismiss stage. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
The district judge ruled that the plaintiffs had done so successfully, denied the government’s motion to dismiss the case, and again set the case for trial later this year. [read post]
13 May 2024, 10:52 am
Even the federal government is raising the alarm about speeding fatalities. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:00 am
Thus far he has not done so and, if he is truly neutral, Merchan should grant the motion. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:18 pm
But this reason, although facially race-neutral under then-governing law, did not independently justify the strike under the totality of the circumstances. [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:00 am
Thus far he has not done so and, if he is truly neutral, Merchan should grant the motion. [read post]
12 May 2024, 7:07 am
The US government filed a motion on Friday to partially end a 27-year-old agreement that requires the federal government to comply with court supervision about the treatment of migrant children in its custody. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm
You are thus required to win an expression of confidence in your character by both the legislative and the executive branches of the government before assuming the responsibilities of a federal prosecutor. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
With a convoluted history that dates to 1968 when California was granted it first waiver, the notice restored California’s authority to set and enforce more stringent vehicle emission standards than the federal government. [read post]
