Search for: "Graham v. Wilson" Results 141 - 160 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2010, 10:25 am by Richard Renner
  The national statute of limitations would address the Supreme Court's holding in Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
------- Title: Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
Below, Stanford Law School's Jacqueline de Armas recaps Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 5:58 am by Nolan and Auerbach
On November 30, the US Supreme Court heard oral argument in Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:22 am by Qui Tam
Supreme Court heard oral arguments on November 30 in the case of Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v United States ex rel Wilson.The question before the court concerns the False Claims Act's public disclosure bar, 31 USC § 3730(e)(4)(A), which bars suits based on public disclosures “in a criminal, civil or administrative hearing, in a congressional, administrative, or [GAO] report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:04 am
., the Court will hear Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
The Court will hear oral argument in the following cases: Monday, Nov. 30: Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:04 am
The Supreme Court hears oral arguments tomorrow (November 30) in the case of Graham County Soil & Conservation District v US ex rel Wilson, up for review from the Fourth Circuit's decision. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 11:30 am by Anna Christensen
" On Monday, November 30, in No. 08-304, Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:45 am
Abbott (08-645), for respondent Wednesday, Nov. 18: Graham County v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 12:53 pm
., Nov. 30: Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:51 am
The defendants argued that the relator’s allegations were disclosed in three ways, each of which the Court rejected: To the state Department of Health and Welfare (Judge Shubb ruled that, under Ninth Circuit precedent, disclosure to a state fraud investigator cannot constitute a public disclosure); During an audit by the state agency (the Court noted the pending case of Graham County Soil & Water Dist. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]