Search for: "Grant v. Public Works, Dept" Results 141 - 160 of 379
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2019, 4:01 am by Public Employment Law Press
Lilley appealed.Citing Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, the Appellate Division noted that "Civil Service Law §75-b prohibits a public employer from taking disciplinary action to retaliate against an employee for reporting improper governmental action. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The employer's annual reviewing and approving requests for the assignment an agency vehicle to an employee does not create a past practiceSpence v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2018 NY Slip Op 08594, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentCertain employees serving with Department of Transportation [DOT] were assigned state-owned vehicles for work and, in some instances, several employees seeking to use the vehicle for commuting as well as for work was… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The employer's annual reviewing and approving requests for the assignment an agency vehicle to an employee does not create a past practiceSpence v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2018 NY Slip Op 08594, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentCertain employees serving with Department of Transportation [DOT] were assigned state-owned vehicles for work and, in some instances, several employees seeking to use the vehicle for commuting as well as for work was… [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 07571 (4th Dept., 2018) the Appellate Division affirmed an order that, inter alia, confirmed the determination of the Sup [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 07571 (4th Dept., 2018) the Appellate Division affirmed an order that, inter alia, confirmed the determination of the Sup [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Court also makes an important observation regarding the High Court’s unjustified encroachment upon the arbitral tribunal’s competence.Interim award and jurisdiction under section 16 – interim award can be challenged separately and independently under section 34, and arbitral tribunal’s authority to rule on its own jurisdiction is restricted and specificM/S Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co-Operative Limited v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am by Welcome
Dept of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, No. 2017-CA002318 (Fla. 4th Cir. [read post]
City of New York, 211 A.D.2d 514, 621 N.Y.S.2d 337 (1st Dept. 1995), a contractor sued the City of New York to be compensated for the additional work it said it performed to complete the brickwork on a public works construction project. [read post]
City of New York, 211 A.D.2d 514, 621 N.Y.S.2d 337 (1st Dept. 1995), a contractor sued the City of New York to be compensated for the additional work it said it performed to complete the brickwork on a public works construction project. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, the Court of Appeals instructs that FOIL is to be "liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]