Search for: "Graves v. Department Of Corrections"
Results 141 - 160
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:11 am
This could gravely imperil future diplomatic relations with foreign states. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:32 am
., Ozawa v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
” It’s a fitting description for solitary confinement at Varner Super Maximum Security Unit in the Arkansas Department of Correction. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm
See, People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:49 pm
The petition before the Court, in Gilbert v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court decision, Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Therefore, our review is for the correction of errors at law. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 pm
Like Vance v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:12 pm
The decision of First Department, in King v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:27 pm
In King v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
The Board said: “As long as the requested transfer has not been sufficiently substantiated, and has not been accepted by the competent department, the original opponent retains the status of party to the opposition proceedings. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
(c) Although the Federal Circuit's test departs from the proper willful blindness standard in important respects, the evidence when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict for SEB was sufficient under the correct standard. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am
At the moment the range of tests for persecution on return is dizzyingly confusing: Refugee Convention – a reasonable degree of likelihood for f (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Sivakumaran [1988] AC 958) Article 3 ECHR -”substantial grounds” (Vilvarajah v UK (1991) 14 EHRR 248) Extradition – balance of probabilities for past and existing facts (Fernandez v Government of Singapore [1971] 1 WLR 987) Extradition –… [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:36 am
The provisions of Section 146 similarly depart from the principles of the Indian Evidence Act. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
The suit had been brought by four physicians who provided abortions; the defendants named were the Attorney General of Illinois, the Director of the Department of Public Health, and [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
In granting the injunction, she simply indicated that the Justice Department was likely, but not certain, to prevail on those points at a later trial in federal court. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
The violations have since been corrected. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm
Rehnquist in Herrera v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
