Search for: "Gray v. No Named Respondents"
Results 141 - 160
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2017, 4:32 pm
The response was high and included some clear messages. 90% of the respondents considered that the relevant Civil Procedure Rules fell short of what they should be. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
Grais and Kathryn C. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:46 am
The photo also depicts the name of the song ‘I.W.T. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
" Scott v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:49 pm
Back at the Obama ranch, there was time to name Charles Bolden, a four-time space shuttle astronaut and retired Marine general, as administrator of NASA. [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 5:01 am
In his classic concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am
As years later in Google Spain, the original publishers, including the aptly named La Vanguardia, preserved their right to publish. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
But the context is really simple: 1 name, 1 skater. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
CTM prices drop 40% (The Gray Blog) France French approach to interpretation of patent claims (International Law Office) India Parallel imports and exhaustion: A different framework for copyrights? [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
” Ropes and Gray Associate Edward Machin said the ICO’s approach could make it one of Europe’s most aggressive privacy regulators, InfoSecurity Magazine reports. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
There is no timetable for the Solicitor General’s office to respond to the invitation in the cases of Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:13 am
B. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 10:19 pm
Richard Gray, Legal bid to stop CERN atom smasher from ‘destroying the world,’ The Daily Telegraph, Sept. 9, 2008. 6. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
Hassel v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:30 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 12:33 pm
Church & Dwight Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 11:20 am
For example, there is a federal case named Henderson v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
Textualism and originalism are NOT two names for the same thing. [read post]
