Search for: "Green v. French"
Results 141 - 160
of 267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
On 15 July 2016, Green J handed down judgment in the case of Smith v Unknown Defendant [2016] EWHC 1775 (QB). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am
Olkowski’s appeal was allowed in Olkowski v Nano-Green Biorefineries Inc., 2024 SKCA 11. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:00 am
Because Freund, a French citizen, died in 2000, her works are protected for 70 years following her death. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
” At Newsweek, Krista Gesaman has a preview of Snyder v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
(IP Osgoode) Global - Patents Royalty rates in the telecommunications industry (IP finance) Canada Songwriters Association of Canada reveal new proposal to deal with P2P downloading at CIPPIC event (Excess Copyright) Green Party leader, Elizabeth May, advocates against ‘crazy copyright laws’ (Michael Geist) Radio-Canada issues YouTube takedown over Harper communion video (Michael Geist) Canada’s new commitment to boost the high-tech sector… [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:00 pm
Along the Isar River and adjacent to the central business district is the city’s famous Englischer Garten (English Garden), so called because it is designed in the informal English style rather than the formal and more ornate French or Italian style. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:49 pm
Greene’s Energy Group LLC, followed by one announced by Gorsuch, in SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Clean Energy Patent Index finds 2008 was record year (Green Patent Blog) Reinstating patents after failure to pay maintenance fee (Patently-O) Federal Circuit judges at five major conferences (Hal Wegner) Who invented the automobile, Mr President? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
HLE reports on it here and David Allen Green reflects on the pleasures of blogging over tweeting here. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(IP Dragon) DuPont learns that global IP theft doesn’t stop at the border (China Hearsay) Europe The chocolate menagerie: General Court decides on bunny, reindeer and mouse shapes: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM (jiplp) ECJ rules on legislative limitations on copyright protection for designs in Europe: Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (jiplp) AG delivers opinion in Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S concerning trade mark law and refilling of… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
- Alicante News reports on registered Community design invalidation case ICD 5353 (Class 99) FORD scores at Spanish CTM Court (Class 46) Ravioli and beans get GI status (Class 46) Finland Lappish beer migrating south – Lapin Kulta (Class 46) France SFR loses right to French trade mark Texto (Class 46) Court of Cologne upholds preliminary action lodged by Consorzio del Formaggio Parmigiano Regganio and grants seizure of Argentinian… [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
Gear, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
Penguin Group v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am
Agar Distributors (India) v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
CTM prices drop 40% (The Gray Blog) France French approach to interpretation of patent claims (International Law Office) India Parallel imports and exhaustion: A different framework for copyrights? [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
(Ron Coleman’s Likelihood of Confusion) ONEL – Pieter Veeze’s 2010 Markenforum speech (Class 46) France Cour d’appel Paris: French law implementing London Protocol procedural so to be enforced immediately with retroactive effect: Unilever v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 12:40 am
In its much awaited judgment in the Delhi University photocopying case (The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
A little over a year ago we left Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Société Elmar Wolf – reported here in the IPKat – and the Court of Justice making it clear to the General Court that 'what it said explicitly was what it meant'. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 2:35 pm
It may remain stored, but not indexed; No judicial review of the justification for the surveillance; No notification to individuals incidentally or mistakenly monitored; Very difficult to impose consequences for violating the FAA, see e.g. government’s argument in Amnesty v. [read post]
