Search for: "Green v. Smith*" Results 141 - 160 of 756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  HLS’s Dehlia Umunna discusses Powell v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:34 pm by Brian Shiffrin
That mandate can be complied with either by arranging an interview with the subject and counsel or merely completing the information gathering by the CPS caseworker without the ability to use the statement in any criminal proceeding” (People v Greene, supra at 641). [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:27 am by Walter Olson
Gulf spill fund flooded with dubious claims [Fred Smith, CEI] If these cases go forward, it will make it economically unfeasible for anyone to make vaccines in this country” [NYT quoting Beck on Bruesewitz v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:45 am
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:09 pm by David Wagner
Our high level discussion was on the following: Offshore wind power generation Renewable energy incentive programs Hydraulic fracturing regulation Aggregation Greenhouse gas litigation California's cap-and-trade program California's Green Chemistry program New mercury standards for coal and oil-burning power plants Fallout from CERCLA decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We have two topics dominating today’s conversation on LXBN: the Supreme Court ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm by Howard Friedman
Magness, (8th Cir., Feb. 4, 2010), the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals held that Muslim prisoner could proceed with his claim under RLUIPA for injunctive relief to obtain use of a prayer rug, but the court dismissed his claim for damages.In Green v. [read post]