Search for: "HOLDING v. STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 69,641
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 3:48 am by Peter A. Mahler
Some nine years ago I wrote about an LLC dissolution case titled Goldstein v Pikus decided by former Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Charles Ramos which also involved a bitter dispute between two estranged co-managing members of a realty-holding LLC. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
On February 23, 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Rahimi’s lawyers say a Supreme Court decision two years ago in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 7:37 am by Eric Goldman
§ 230, forecloses Doe’s claim as currently pled, because she seeks to hold Meta liable for content created by her trafficker. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
And yet it appears it hold great symbolic power (just as the longed for presumption of shared care or equal contact held great symbolic power for the fathers’ rights lobby). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, plaintiff fails to plead facts stating a claim for both “fraud on the court” and under Judiciary Law§ 487. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:15 am
  The Court did allow the plaintiffs to replead "equity expropriation " claims that might have been considered direct under the Delaware Supreme Court's holding in Gentile v. [read post]
This decision was brought to the Court as a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Carl v. [read post]