Search for: "HTC Inc."
Results 141 - 160
of 337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2012, 9:48 pm
Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 11:55 am
The action and investigation initiated by the ITC include Motorola Mobility, Inc. and HTC Corporation (HTC), whose products incorporate the alleged infringing RF ICs. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:37 pm
The 13 companies are AT&T, Verizon Wireless, Sprint Nextel, T-Mobile, Apple, HTC, Motorola Mobility, Palm, LG, Samsung, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:21 am
On 4 July 2012, the England and Wales High Court (Patents Court) delivered a judgement in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat), finding that five HTC devices – all running Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) – do not infringe any valid claims of four Apple patents. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:58 am
HTC America, Inc., 2012 WL 2412070 (W.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:42 am
Supreme Court Gow v Grant (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 29 (24 May 2012) Phillips v Mulcaire (Rev 1) [2012] UKSC 28 (24 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) G1 v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 867 (04 July 2012) Daejan Properties Ltd v Campbell [2012] EWCA Civ 875 (19 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Ampurius NU Homes Holdings Ltd v Telford Homes (Creekside) Ltd [2012] EWHC 1820 (Ch) (04 July 2012) Starbucks (UK) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc &… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:17 am
The case is HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat). [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:11 pm
HTC Corp., Asia’s second-largest smartphone maker, won a London court ruling against Apple Inc. over patents for touchscreen technology used for its mobile devices, including Apple’s slide-to-unlock feature. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 2:49 am
Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:11 pm
The action and investigation initiated by the ITC include Motorola Mobility, Inc. and HTC Corporation (HTC), whose products incorporate the alleged infringing RF ICs. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:11 pm
The action and investigation initiated by the ITC include Motorola Mobility, Inc. and HTC Corporation (HTC), whose products incorporate the alleged infringing RF ICs. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:21 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified RF Micro Devices, Inc. of Greensboro, North Carolina; Motorola Mobility, Inc. of Libertyville, Illinois; HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington; and HTC Corporation of Taiwan, as respondents in this investigation. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:40 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified HTC Corporation of Taiwan; HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington; and Exedea, Inc. of Houston, Texas as respondents in this investigation. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:56 pm
On June 4, 2012, Apple Inc., f/k/a Apple Computer, Inc. of Cupertino, California (“Apple”) filed an enforcement complaint in Certain Personal Data and Mobile Communications Devices and Related Software (Inv. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:49 pm
Apple Inc. filed an enforcement action at the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:23 am
In Order No. 15, ALJ Rogers granted a joint motion filed by Digitude and respondents HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., Nokia Corporation, and Nokia Inc., to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:48 pm
District Court for the District of Delaware against HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. involving the ‘471, ‘538, ‘575, and ‘190 patents. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:37 am
Here’s a big hint: This patent is owned by Apple Inc. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:00 pm
This post discusses why this is important and how one can go about developing a winning patent strategy using engineering for the human element, training and IP audits, and learning from success. 4) The Patent Prospector: Copycat – This post discusses the Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:00 pm
This post discusses why this is important and how one can go about developing a winning patent strategy using engineering for the human element, training and IP audits, and learning from success. 4) The Patent Prospector: Copycat – This post discusses the Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
