Search for: "Hague v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 1,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 12:22 pm by Mark Ashton
Two years later, under the pretense of attending a wedding, Golan flew to the United States with the child and moved into a shelter in New York. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:13 pm by Joel R. Brandes
He emphasized that Petitioner voluntarily brought EZL to the United States and executed legal documents allowing the child to stay in the United States. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 8:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
After they married, Petitioner continued living in Jamaica, and Respondent traveled back and forth between Jamaica and the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 10:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Department of State and filled out a Hague Convention petition with the United States Embassy in Ecuador. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
Marcoski objected, arguing that an award would be clearly inappropriate because she acted in good faith when she removed L.N.R. to the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 6:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
Marcoski objected, arguing that an award would be clearly inappropriate because she acted in good faith when she removed L.N.R. to the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 3:12 pm
Additionally, the court held that the fact that the child brought more personal belongings with her than usual, in anticipation that she would remain in the United States was evidence of a settled purpose to reside in the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2012, 7:48 am by Annette Burns
Chafin involves a Hague Convention issue where a child with dual citizenship (Scotland and the United States) was returned to Scotland (from Alabama)  with her mother by way of an 11th Circuit decision. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 2:01 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Because the District Court granted the petition as to A.D., it instructed the District Court to order that A.D. be returned to the United States forthwith. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
The district court observed that the United States Supreme Court has established that "[b]efore a federal court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the procedural requirement of service of summons must be satisfied. [read post]